When a customer applies for an A$800,000 mortgage, opens a wealth management account, or requests a high-limit credit line, standard verification isn’t enough.
The stakes are too high. Fraudsters know this, which is why high-value accounts are prime targets for synthetic identities, deepfakes, and credential theft.
In Australia, scam and fraud losses reached a record A$2.74 billion in 2023 according to the ACCC’s Scamwatch, with identity crime ranking among the most costly categories. Losses to investment and financial scams have continued to climb, and digital banking fraud has grown sharply alongside Australia’s rapid shift to app-based banking. Across the wider APAC region, banks, insurers, and fintechs saw identity fraud surge 121% year-over-year in 2024, with deepfake attacks increasing 194% and synthetic identities becoming harder to detect at the document level.
For financial institutions, one successful fraud attempt on a high-value account can wipe out the margins from hundreds of legitimate customers.
That’s where video-based identity checks come in. By adding a live human verification layer to high-risk onboarding, financial institutions can catch fraud that automated systems miss while keeping the process fast enough that legitimate customers don’t walk away.
Why High-Value Accounts Need Stronger Verification
Under AUSTRAC’s Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (AML/CTF Act), reporting entities must apply Enhanced Customer Due Diligence (ECDD) for customers and transactions assessed as higher risk. Remote onboarding without face-to-face contact is never presumed low-risk. Risk-based due diligence frameworks already require enhanced verification for certain account types. The question is how to apply it without creating friction that drives legitimate customers away.
Scenarios where video identity checks add the most value:
- High-value accounts: Wealth management, private banking, large credit facilities, and commercial lending where potential losses justify extra scrutiny.
- Remote onboarding without branch access: Digital-first institutions that can’t rely on in-person verification need equivalent assurance. Australia’s growing cohort of neobanks and digital lenders operate with limited or no branch networks, making remote verification their primary customer identity pathway.
- Customers flagged by automated systems: When algorithms detect anomalies but can’t make a definitive call, human judgment fills the gap.
- Regulatory requirements: AUSTRAC requires reporting entities to apply ECDD for higher-risk customers and transactions. APRA-regulated institutions must also maintain robust operational risk frameworks that cover the integrity of their customer identification processes.
When Legitimate Customers Get Blocked
Overly cautious algorithms create a different kind of risk. Research shows that 68% of consumers have abandoned onboarding processes they found too difficult.
For high-value applicants, the stakes are even higher. A rejected wealth management prospect doesn’t reattempt. They move to a competitor with a smoother process, and their lifetime value goes with them.
The cause is usually mundane: a biometric mismatch from ageing, an ID photo taken under poor lighting, or a recently reissued document that the system doesn’t recognise. The automated system flags the anomaly, but can’t resolve it.
Without a recovery pathway, the institution loses a legitimate, high-value customer to protect against a risk that didn’t actually exist.
When Real Fraud Slips Through Automated Checks
The opposite problem is equally dangerous. Financial institutions report that 1 in every 20 verification attempts is fraudulent, a 21% increase from the previous year. In Australia, IDCARE — the national identity and cyber support service — has recorded a sustained rise in identity crime referrals, and AI-generated deepfakes have made impersonation attempts increasingly convincing across the region.
Sophisticated attackers target high-value accounts specifically because the payoff justifies the effort.
Synthetic identities, deepfake videos, and stolen credentials are designed to pass document-level checks that work well for low-risk applications.
Automated systems catch volume-based fraud patterns effectively. But for a targeted attack on a single high-value account, the attacker only needs to fool the algorithm once.
A trained verification agent conducting a live video session can spot behavioural inconsistencies, challenge the applicant in real time, and make judgement calls that no algorithm can replicate.
Read More: Reinforcing Trust: Tackling Fraud with Stronger Authentication in Finance
How Video Identity Checks Work

A live video session exposes things that automated KYC simply cannot see. For low-risk applicants, that gap doesn’t matter much.
For a wealth management prospect or a mortgage applicant, it’s the difference between catching a sophisticated attack and writing it off as a loss six months later. Here’s what trained agents surface during a high-stakes verification session:
Real-time Liveness, Not Still-Frame Liveness
Deepfake video can pass a passive selfie check. It struggles when an agent asks the applicant to turn their head at an unscripted angle, hold up a hand on cue, or describe an object in the room. Unpredictability is the defence.
Document Forensics on the Physical Article
OCR reads text. An agent can ask the applicant to tilt the document, watch how the hologram refracts light, check microprinting under zoom, and verify the laminate edge. Forgeries that pass image-based checks often fail this kind of physical scrutiny.
Behavioural Inconsistency Under Pressure
Synthetic identities are usually operated by people who don’t know the person they’re impersonating. A coached impersonator hesitates on basic questions: Which branch did you open your last account at? Who referred you? Algorithms can’t ask these.
Coercion and Duress Signals
High-value account fraud increasingly involves a real person being coached or coerced off-screen. Agents can spot eyes flicking off-camera, scripted phrasing, or another voice in the background. None of this shows up in document upload flows.
How 8×8 Video Interaction Powers Identity Checks

The point of video for high-value onboarding isn’t to replace automated KYC. It’s to layer enhanced due diligence on top of it for the applicants who warrant it. 8×8 Video Interaction is built to slot into that tiered workflow rather than run as a separate process.
- Triggered escalation from your onboarding stack: When risk scoring or account thresholds trip an ECDD rule, the API or iFrame integration hands the applicant directly to a verification agent without breaking the session.
- A documented verification trail: Each session can be recorded with full video and audio, and agents can capture photos, annotate documents, and tag the customer’s GPS location during the call. Combined with detailed call logs — including duration, shared images, and call ratings — your compliance team has a documented trail to support ECDD file requirements. Under the Privacy Act 1988, video recordings and photos captured during verification sessions constitute personal information. Organisations must have a lawful basis for collection, obtain appropriate consent, and limit retention to what is necessary for the verification purpose in line with the Australian Privacy Principles (APPs).
- Agent management and visibility: Automatic call distribution routes incoming verification sessions to available agents, while the admin dashboard on 8×8 Connect gives managers a consolidated view of agent performance, call history, and customer data — so you can staff and manage your ECDD queue with full visibility.
- Administrative oversight: The admin dashboard provides aggregated call insights across all agents, including call duration and ratings, giving supervisors the oversight they need to maintain verification quality. Managers can add or remove agents and review individual call logs and shared images after each session.
- Enterprise-grade security and global infrastructure: 8×8’s platform holds SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and PCI/DSS certifications, with infrastructure across data centres in Asia, Europe, and the US to support data residency requirements. With a local presence in Australia and data centres across the region, session data can be stored in alignment with Australian data sovereignty expectations. Session recordings and call logs give your compliance team the raw evidence to meet AUSTRAC record-keeping obligations and APRA operational risk standards.
The platform handles institutional volume without compromising the assurance level that makes EDD worth doing in the first place.

Read More: Customer Support in Financial Services with 8×8 Video Interaction
Strengthen Your Identity Verification with Video
High-value accounts deserve high-assurance verification. Video-based identity checks give financial institutions the tools to stop sophisticated fraud while keeping legitimate customers moving through onboarding.
With 8×8 Video Interaction, you get secure, browser-based video verification that integrates into existing workflows, creates compliance-ready audit trails, and scales with your business. So don’t wait, talk to 8×8 today about adding video identity checks to your onboarding workflow.
FAQ – Video-Based Identity Checks in Australia
- What are video-based identity checks?
Video-based identity checks use live video calls between applicants and trained verification agents to confirm identity. Agents examine documents, conduct liveness checks, and assess behavioural signals in real time. - When should financial institutions use video verification?
Video verification is appropriate for high-value accounts, remote onboarding without branch access, cases flagged by automated systems, and scenarios where regulations require enhanced due diligence. Under AUSTRAC’s AML/CTF Act, all higher-risk customers and transactions require Enhanced Customer Due Diligence (ECDD), making video identity checks a practical tool for meeting those obligations. - Is video KYC compliant with Australian financial regulations?
Yes. AUSTRAC does not prescribe a specific verification technology, but requires reporting entities to apply risk-based customer identification and verification procedures, including ECDD for higher-risk customers and transactions. Video KYC, when implemented with proper controls, supports compliance with the AML/CTF Act and APRA operational risk standards. Organisations must also comply with the Privacy Act 1988 and the Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) when collecting, using, and storing biometric and personal data captured during video sessions. - How does video verification detect deepfakes?
Trained agents use interactive liveness checks, behavioural observation, and visual cues to spot deepfake attempts. The combination of human judgement and AI-assisted tools provides stronger fraud protection than automated systems alone. - Does video verification slow down customer onboarding?
Most video verification sessions are completed in minutes. While longer than instant automated approval, video verification is much faster than email exchanges, document re-uploads, or branch visits.
